GROUP PSYCHOTHERAPY AND COMMUNICATION
Keywords:
PSYCHOTHERAPYAbstract
It is, indeed, very difficult, for those who want to orient themselves among the variety of theories and methods of group psychotherapy, to find the basis which will allow them to understand the rationale of their differences or similarities and to classify them logically. Every school of thought proposes an apparently different set of basic concepts and denies almost all the others. However, experience teaches us, in .group as well as individual psychotherapy, that every skilled therapist will get good results using the method he prefers among the accepted ones and, what is more, that there is a greater difference between a beginner and an experienced practitioner of any school than between two men equally qualified in two divergent schools of thought.
References
1. MORENO, J. L, Transference, Counter-Transference and Tele, Group Psychotherapy, Vol. VII, No. 2, 1954, Beacon House, Beacon, N.Y.
2. BUHLER, KARL: Sprach Theori, Jena: Gustav Fischer, 1934.
3. FLIEss, R.: Silence and verbalization. Internat. J. PsychoAnalysis, 30: 1949.
4. LAIN ENTRALGo, P.: La Historia Clnica. Consejo Sup. de Invest. Cientifca, Madrid, 1950.
5. MEERLOO, J. A.: Free association, silence and the multiple function of speech. Psychiat. Quart., 26: No. 1, 1952.
6. REIK, TH.: Listening with the Third Ear, N. Y.: Garden City Books, 1951.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Psychodrama, Sociometry, and Group Psychotherapy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.