TEST FLIGHT: A GROUP DREAM A contribution to sociodramatic research

Abstract

Whether groups can truly dream depends upon one's definitions. If the group is defined as an entity whose parts are human and in communication, the line between analogy and identity becomes hazy. If a more synthetic definition seems appropriate, we may still distinguish between the psychology of the component individuals as group members, and their psychology as "pure individuals." Under either definition, it is not merely metaphorical to refer to a group's history and myths, plans and dreams. Nor is it surprising to find that groups use their images of past and future to much the same ends as do individuals. The recollection of the past in either myths or history-a distinction of which more is made in Western society than elsewhere-is used to justify, explain, make livable or even enviable, the present. Similarly, dreams and plans- again a distinction with culturally limited meaning are used to make the present livable, full of potential.