Role Repertoires of Members in an Effective Small Group: A Simulation
Keywords:
Effective Small Group, SimulationAbstract
Survey data representing role repertoires were mathematically combined to simulate small groups and determine an effective five member composition.
The Systematic Multiple Level Observation of Groups (SYMLOG) questionnaire was used to inventory roles that are multidimensional, dynamic, and sometimes conflicting. Survey responses, mostly from members of U.S. organizations, were originally gathered during leadership programs. The SYMLOG Optimum Profile served as a criterion of effectiveness that balances task accomplishment with member satisfaction. The most effective group had 5 members playing 4 primary roles: social organizer, democratic task leader (2), team player, and conservative worker. The simulation illustrates the use of role repertoires for evaluating group performance and identifying
resources, the potentials for conflict, and mediation strategies, which might remain hidden were only single roles considered
References
Bales, R. F. (1984). Texts for "The Bales report" to an individual. San Diego, CA:
SYMLOG Consulting Group.
Bales, R. F. (1999). Social interaction systems: Theory and measurement. New
Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Bales, R. F., & Cohen, S. P. (with Williamson, S. A.). (1979). SYMLOG: A system for
the multiple level observation of groups. New York: Free Press.
Beck, D., & Fisch, R. (in press). Dynamics of group role diversity in work teams: A
comparison of SYMLOG and Belbin's team role approach. In A. P. Hare (Ed.),
Analysis of social interaction systems: SYMLOG research and applications (chap.
2). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Biddle, B. J. (1991). Role theory. In E. F. Borgatta & M. L. Borgatta (Eds.), Encyclo-
pedia of sociology (pp. l 681-1685). New York: Macmillan.
Blatner, A. & Blatner, A. (1988). Role dynamics: The psychological foundation of psy-
chodrama. In A. Blatner & A. Blatner, Foundation of psychodrama: History, theory,
and practice (3rd ed., pp. 101-112). New York: Springer.
Blau, P. M. (1991). Multigroup affiliations and complex role sets. In R.R. Blau & N.
Goodman (Eds.), Social roles and social institutions (pp. 37-57). Boulder, CO:
Westview.
Hale, A. E. (1975). Role diagram expanded. Group Psychotherapy and Psychodrama,
28, 77-104.
Hare, A. P. (1968). Role structure. In D. L. Sills (Ed.), International encyclopedia of
social sciences (Vol. 6, pp. 283-288). New York: Macmillan & Free Press.
Hare, A. P. (1982). Creativity in small groups. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Hare, A. P., Blumberg, H. H., Davies, M. E, & Kent, M. V. (1994). Small group
research: A handbook. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Hare, A. P., Blumberg, H. H., Davies, M. F., & Kent, M. V. (1996). Small groups: An
introduction. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Hare, A. P., & Hare, J. R. (1996). J. L. Moreno. London: Sage.
Koenigs, R. J. (2000). SYMLOG reliability and validity. San Diego, CA: SYMLOG
Consulting Group.
Moreno, J. L.. Jennings, H. H., Criswell, J. H., Katz, L., Blake, R. R., Mouton, J. S.,
et al. (Eds.). (1960). The sociometry reader. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Sarbin, T. R., & Allen, V. L. (1968). Role theory. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.),
Handbook of social psychology (Vol. I, pp. 488-567). Reading, MA: Addison-Wes-
ley.
SYMLOG Consulting Group. (2002). SYMLOG Individual and Organizational Values
survey questionnaire (co-worker form). San Diego, CA: Author.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Psychodrama, Sociometry, and Group Psychotherapy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.