Enhancing Teamwork in Complex Environments Through Team Training
Keywords:
TrainingAbstract
Although the importance of team training has become widely recognized, research is needed to more clearly understand what instructional strategies actually lead to enhanced teamwork and performance. This research incorporates a theoretical framework, based on the work of J. A. Cannon-Bowers, S. I. Tannenbaum, E. Salas, and C. E. Volpe ( 1995), to guide the systematic development of training that targeted specific team competencies (i.e., knowledge, skills, and attitudes). The theoretically designed training was delivered to 42 male aviators from an undergraduate naval aviation community. A comprehensive evaluation of this training was conducted using a multiple-measurement approach. Results provide strong support for the effectiveness of this team training in improving critical team competencies.
References
Boguslaw, R., & Porter, E. H. (1962). Team functions and training. In R. M. Gagne (Ed.), Psychological principles on systems development (pp. 337--416). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Brannick, M. T., Roach, R. M., & Salas, E. (1991, April). Understanding team performance: A multimethod study. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, St. Louis, MO.
Brannick, M. T., Roach, R. M., & Salas, E. (1993). Understanding team performance: A multimethod study. Human Performance, 6, 287-308.
Briggs, G. E., & Naylor, J.C. (1964). Experiments on team training in a CIC-type task environment (NAVTRADEVCEN Tech. Rep. No. 1327-1). Port Washington, NY: United States Naval Training Device Center.
Briggs, G. E., & Naylor, J. C. (I 965). Team versus individual training, training task fidelity, and task organization effects on transfer performance by three-man teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 387-392.
Cannon-Bowers, J. A, Prince, C., Salas, E., Owens, J.M., Morgan, B. B., Jr., & Gonos, G. H. (1989). Determining aircrew coordination effectiveness. Proceedings of the 11th lnterservicellndustry Training Systems Conference, Washington, DC, 1, 128-136.
Cannon-Bowers, J. A, Salas, E., & Converse, S. A. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In N. J. Castellan, Jr. (Ed.), Current issues in individual and group decision making (pp. 221-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cannon-Bowers, J. A, Tannenbaum, S. I., Salas, E., & Volpe, C. E. (1995). Defining team competencies and establishing team training requirements. In R. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 333-380). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dyer, J. L. (1984). Team research and team training: A state-of-the-art review. In F. A Muckier (Ed.), Human factors review: 1984 (pp. 285-323). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
Dynamics Research Corporation. (1990). Development of measures of crew coordination (Tech. Rep. DAHC35-89-D-0030, Del. Order 0001). Ft. Rucker, AL: Army Research Institute.
Federman, P. J., & Siegel, A. I. (1965). Communications as a measurable index of team behavior (NAVTRADEVCEN Tech. Rep. No. 1537-1). Wayne, PA: Applied Psychological Services Science Center.
Foushee, H. C., Lauber, J. K., Baetge, M. M., & Acomb, D. B. (1986). Crew factors in flight operations: ill. The operational significance of exposure to short-haul air transport operations (NASA Technical Memorandum 88322). Moffett Field, CA: NASA-Ames Research Center.
Foushee, H. C., & Manos, K. L. (1981). Information transfer within the cockpit: Problems in intracockpit communications. In C. E. Billings & E. S. Cheany (Eds.), Information transfer problems in the aviation system (NASA Tech. Paper 1875, pp. 63-71). Moffett Field, CA: NASA-Ames Research Center.
Fowlkes, J.E., Lane, N. E., Salas, E., Franz, T., & Oser, R. L. (1994). Improving the measurement of team performance: The TARGETs methodology. Military Psychology, 6, 47--61.
Gregorich, S. E., Helmreich, R. L., & Wilhelm, J. A. (1990). The structure of cockpit management attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 682-690.
Hall, E. R., & Rizzo, W. A (1975, March). An assessment of U.S. Navy tactical team training (TAEG Report No. 18). Orlando, FL: Training Analysis and Evaluation Group.
Helmreich, R. L. (1984). Cockpit management attitudes. Human Factors, 26, 583-589.
Helmreich, R. L., Chidester, T. R., Foushee, H. C., Gregorich, S., & Wilhelm, J. A. (I 989). How effective is cockpit resource management training? Issues in evaluating the impact of programs to enhance crew coordination (Tech. Rep. 89-2). Austin: NASA-University of Texas.
Helmreich, R. L., & Fouchee, H. C. (1993). Why crew resource management? Empirical and theoretical bases of human factors training in aviation. In E. L. Wiener, B.
G. Kanki, & R. C. Helmreich (Eds.), Cockpit resource management (pp. 3-45). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Helmreich, R. L., Wilhelm, J. A., & Gregorich, S. (1988). Revised versions of the Cockpit Management Attitudes Questionnaire (CMAQ) and CRM seminar evaluation form (NASA/UT Technical Report 88-3). Austin: NASA-University of Texas.
Jensen, R. S. (1986). The effects of expressivity and flight task on cockpit communication and resource management (NASA Final Tech. Rep. No. APL 86-1). Moffet Field, CA: NASA-Ames Research Center.
Johnston, W. A. (1966). Transfer of team skills as a function of type training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 50, 102-108.
Johnston, W. A., & Briggs. G. E. (1968). Team performance as a function of team arrangement and workload. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 89-94.
Kanaki, B. G., Lizito, S., & Foushee, H. C. (1989, January). Communication indices of crew coordination. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 60, 56-60,
Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993). Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 311-328.
Krum, R. L., & Farina, A. J. (1962). Effectiveness of integrated flight simulator training in promoting B-52 crew coordination (MRL Tech. Documentary Rep. 62-1). Wright Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Aerospace Medical Research Laboratories.
Lanzetta, J. T., & Roby, T. B. (I 960). The relationship between certain group process variables and group problem solving efficiency. Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 135-148.
Leedom, D. K., & Simon, R. (1995). Improving team coordination: A case for behavior based training. Military Psychology, 7, 109-122.
McIntyre, R. M., & Salas, E. (1995). Team performance in complex environments: What we have learned so far. In R. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision-making in organizations (pp. 9-45). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Morgan, B. B., Jr., Glickman, A. S., Woodard, E. A., Blaiwes, A. S., & Salas, E. (1986). Measurement of team behaviors in a Navy environment (Tech. Rep. No. NTSC TR-86-014). Orlando, FL: Naval Training Systems Center, Human Factors Division.
Naylor, J.C., & Briggs, G. E. (1965). Team training effectiveness under various conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 223-229.
Nieva, V. F., Fleishman, E. A., & Rieck, A. (1978). Team dimensions: Their indentity, their measurement and their relationships (Tech. Rep. No. DAH1978-C-0001). Washington, DC: Advanced Research Resources Organization.
Orasanu, J.M. (1990). Shared mental models and crew decision making (CSL Tech. Rep. Na,46). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, Cognitive Science Laboratory.
Oser, R. L., McCallum, G. A., Salas, E., & Morgan, B. B., Jr. (1989). Toward a definition of teamwork: An analysis of critical team behaviors (Tech. Rep. No. NTSC 89-004). Orlando, FL: Naval Training Systems Center, Human Factors Division.
Oser, R. L., Prince, C. W., Morgan, B. B., Jr., & Simpson, S. S. (1991 ). An analysis of aircrew communication patterns and content (Tech. Rep. No. NTSC 90-009). Orlando, FL: Naval Training Systems Center, Human Factors Division.
Prince, C., Chidester, T. R., Cannon-Bower, J. A., & Bowers, C. (1992). Aircrew coordination- Achieving teamwork in the cockpit. In R. W. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance (pp. 329-353). New York: Ablex.
Prince, C., & Salas, E. (1993). Training and research for teamwork in the military aircrew. In E. L. Weiner, B. G. Kanki, & R. L. Helmreich (Eds.), Cockpit resource management (pp. 337-366). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Ralphs, L. T., & Stephan, E. (1986). HRD in the Fortune 500. Training and Development Journal, 40, 69-76.
Saari, L. M., Johnson, T. R., McLaughlin, S. D., & Zimmerle, D. M. (1988). A survey of management training and education practices. Personnel Psychology, 41, 731-743.
Salas, E., Bowers, C., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1995). Military team research: Ten years of progress. Military Psychology, 7, 55-75.
Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1997). Methods, tools, and strategies for team training. In M.A. Quing and education practices. lmTraining for a rapidly changing workplace: Applications of psychological research (pp. 249-279). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Salas, E., Dickinson, T. L., Converse, S. A., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1992). Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In R. W. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance (pp. 3-29). Norwood, NJ: Albex.
Schmitt, N. (1989). Construct validity in personnel selection. In B. J. Fallon, H. PIister, & J. Brebner (Eds.), Advances in industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 331-341). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Stout, R. J., Salas, E., & Carson, R. (1994). Individual task proficiency and team process behavior: What's important for team functioning? Military Psychology, 6, 177-192.
Sundstrom, E., DeMeuse, K. P., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45, 120-133.
Tannenbaum, S. I., Mathieu, J.E., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1991). Meeting trainees' expectations: The influence of training fulfillment on the development of commitment, self-efficacy, and motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 759-769.
Tannenbaum, S. I., Smith-Jentsch, K., & Behson, S. (1997). Training team leaders to facilitate team learning and performance. In J. A. Cannon-Bowers & E. Salas (Eds.), Decision making under stress: Implications for training and simulation. Manuscript in preparation.
Tannenbaum, S. I., & Woods, S. B. (1992). Determining a strategy for evaluating training: Operating within organizational constraints. Human Resource Planning Journal, 15, 63-82.
Wiener, E. L., Kanki, B. G., & Helmreich, R. L. (1993). Cockpit resource management. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Williges, R. C., Johnston, W. A., & Briggs, G. E. (1966). Role of verbal communication in teamwork. Journal of Applied Psychology, 50, 473 4 7 8 .
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Psychodrama, Sociometry, and Group Psychotherapy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.