The Effect of Nonverbal Doubling on the Emotional Response of the Double

Authors

  • Guy S. Taylor Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12926/e7mw5q28

Keywords:

Double

Abstract

This study examined the effectiveness of non verbal doubling in generating an emotional response in the auxiliary similar to that of the protagonist. The subjects consisted of college undergraduates enrolled in an introductory speech course and were randomly assigned to control and experimental groups. Both groups were exposed to a fiveminute nonverbal videotape of a single individual. The experimental group was requested to assume the physical posture and to imitate all physical activity of the individual in the tape, while the control group was asked only to observe the videotape. Mehrabian's Semantic Differential of Emotional Response was used to assess the emotional response of the subjects to the experience. Significant differences were found in the predicted directions on the Pleasure-Displeasure and Dominance-Submissiveness scales of the S.D.E.R., (p < .05). The null hypothesis was supported on the Arousal-Nonarousal scale, which is consistent with the arousal level of the videotaped protagonist. This study supports the hypothesis that nonverbal doubling generates an emotional response in the auxiliary similar to that of the protagonist.

References

Darwin, C. The expression of the emotions in man and animals. London: John Murray, 1872. (Current edition: Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965).

Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. Unmasking the face. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1975.

Goldstein, J .A. Investigation of doubling as a technique for involving severely withdrawn patients in group psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1971, 37, 155-162.

Goldstein, S. G. The effects of doubling on involvement in group psychotherapy as measured by number and duration of patient utterances. Psychotherapy: Therapy, Research, and Practice, 1967, 4, 57-60.

Izard, C.E. The face of emotion. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1971.

Izard, C.E. Patterns of emotions. New York: Academic Press, 1972.

Kipper, D.A. Trends in research on the effectiveness of psychodrama: Retrospect and prospect. Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama and Sociometry, 1978, 31, 5-18.

Kipper, D .A. & Ben-Ely, Z. The effectiveness of the psychodrama tic double method, the reflection method and lecturing in the training of empathy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1979, 35, 370-375.

Meerbaum, M. The use of nonverbal doubling to increase the verbal identification and expression of emotion in schizophrenic patients. Unpublished paper. Washington, D.C.: St. Elizabeths Hospital, 1976.

Mehrabian, A. Silent messages. Belmont, Cal.: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1971.

Mehrabian, A. Basic dimensions for a general psychological theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Oelgeschlager, Gunn and Hain, Publishers, 1980.

Moreno, J.L. Who shall survive? Beacon, N.Y.: Beacon House, 1953.

Moreno, J.L., &Moreno, Z.T. Psychodrama: Vol. 3. Beacon, N.Y.: Beacon House, 1969.

Moreno, Z.T. A survey of psychodramatic techniques. Group Psychotherapy and Psychodrama, 1959, 7, 5-14.

Perrott, L. Doubling from an existential phenomenological viewpoint. Group Psychotherapy and Psychodrama, 1975, 28, 66-69.

Toeman, Z. The "double situation" in psychodrama. Sociatry, 1948, 1, 436-448.

Yablonsky, L. Psychodrama: Resolving emotional problems through role playing. New York: Basic Books, 1976.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-14

Issue

Vol. 36 No. 2 (1983): Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama, and Sociometry

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Psychodrama, Sociometry, and Group Psychotherapy

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
  2. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
  3. NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
  4. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.