Psychodrama a n d Sociometry Training: A Survey of Curriculums
Keywords:
Survey of Curriculums, Sociometry TrainingAbstract
The survey was undertaken to examine curriculum requirements in various clinical and academic programs. Of the 95 trainers, educators
and practitioners (TEP's) contacted, only 31 replied. Although limited, the survey helped raise a number of questions relating to cur-
riculum, certification requirements, and the role of the three main organizations: the American Society of Group Psychotherapy and
Psychodrama, the American Board of Examiners of Psychodrama, Sociometry, and Group Psychotherapy, and the Federation of
Trainers and Training Programs in Psychodrama. The relative lack of emphasis on training for empirical work in psychodrama and
sociometry seemed to be prevalent within the various training programs in psychodrama.
References
Enneis, J. M. Establishing a psychodrama program. Group Psychotherapy, 1952, 5, 111-119.
Hollander, C. A blueprint for a psychodrama program. Group Psychotherapy, 1968, 21, 223-228.
Kipper, D. A. Trends in research on the effectiveness of psychodrama: Retrospect and prospect. Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama, and Sociometry, 1978, 31, 5-18.
Moreno, J. L. Who shall survive? New York: Beacon House, 1953.
Perlman, D. & Lane, R. The "clinical" master's degree. Teaching of Psychology, 1981, 8 72-77.
Principles and guidelines. American Psychologist, 1981, 36, 633-686.
Warner, G. D. Psychodrama in a small psychiatric center. Group Psychotherapy, 1968, 21, 229-234.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Psychodrama, Sociometry, and Group Psychotherapy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.