A SOCIOMETRIC STUDY OF LEARNING DISABILITY CHILDREN AND TYPE OF TEACHING STRATEGY

Authors

  • JERRY B. HUTTON Author
  • LINDA POLO Author

Keywords:

STRATEGY

Abstract

Several studies (Gottlieb & Budoff, 1973; Goodman & Gottlieb, 1972; Baldwin, 1958; Johnson, 1950) have reported that educable mentally retarded students in regular academic classrooms are significantly less accepted and more rejected than their normal peers. Bryan (1974) has noted similar findings for learning disabled students. The present study reports the sociometric status of learning disability students who are enrolled in classrooms with an almost equal balance between the number of learning disabled (LD) students and the number of non-learning disabled (NLD) students. In addition, the sociometric status of LD students is compared in three different instructional models. The questions posed by the study are: (a) Do LD children choose NLD children significantly more often than NLD children choose LD children on acceptance questions, regardless of the instructional strategy? (b) On rejection questions, do NLD children reject LD children significantly more often than LD children reject NLD children, regardless of instructional strategy?

References

Baldwin, W. K. The social position of the educable mentally retarded child in the regular grades in the public school. Exceptional Children, 1958, 25, 106-108.

Bryan, T. H. Peer popularity of learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1974, 7, 621-625.

Goodman, H., Gottlieb, J., and Harrison, R. Social acceptance of educable mentally retarded children integrated into a nongraded elementary school. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1972, 76, 412-417.

Gottlieb, J. and Budoff, M. Social acceptance of retarded children in nongraded schools differing in architecture. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1973, 78, 15-19.

Gronlund, N. E. Sociometry in the Classroom. New York: Harper & Bros., 1959.

Hartup, W. W., Glazer, J. A., and Charlesworth, R. Peer reinforcement and sociometric status. Child Development, 1967, 38, 1017-1024.

Johnson, D. G. A study of the social position of mentally handicapped children in the regular grades. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1950, 55, 60-89.

Myklebust, H. R. The pupil rating scale. New York: Grune & Stratton, Inc., 1971.

Project CHILD. Programming for the language disabled child. Austin, Texas: Texas Education Agency, 1974.

Published

2025-01-14