A CONSISTENCY MEASURE OF SOCIOMETRIC ST ATVS RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF SELECTED PERSONALITY FACTORS

Authors

  • C. EWING COOLEY Author

Keywords:

FACTORS

Abstract

The effectiveness of sociometric techniques as estimates of personal adjustment has been reviewed by Bonney and Fessenden and Gronlund. The relationship between sociometric scores and various methods of personality assessment are not marked when total groups are studied by correlations. When a group with high choice-status is contrasted with a lowchoice- status group, the studies consistently show the high choice-status groups to be reliably superior in some psychologically and/or socially approved types of behavior. Low correlations suggest that sub-groups exist between these extremes that are not characterized by the progressive increase of personal adjustment with status that the contrast of high choicestatus to low choice-status groupings suggests.

References

Bonney, N. E. and Fessenden, S. Manual for Bonney-Fessenden Sociograph. California Test Bureau, Los Angeles, California, 1955.

Cattell, Raymond. Personality and Motivation Structure and Measurement. Yonkerson-Hudson, New York; World Book Co., 1957.

Criswell, Joan. A Sociometric Study of Race Cleavage in the Classroom. Archives Psychology. No. 235, 1939.

Feldman, Shel. Cognitive Consistency. Academic Press; New York, 1966.

Gronlund, Norman E. Sociometry in the Classroom. New York; Harper and Brothers, 1959.

Jennings, Helen. Leadership and Isolation. New York; Longmans, Green and Co., 1950.

Moreno, J. L. Progress and Pitfalls in Sociometric Theory. Sociometry. 1947, IO, 268-72.

Neugarten, Bernice. Social Class and Friendship Among School Children. American Journal of Sociology. 1946, 51, 305-13.

Wiggins, Jerry S. and Winder, C. L. The Peer Nomination Inventory: An Empirically Derived Sociometric Measure of Adjustment in Preadolescent Boys. Psychological Reports. 1961, 5-V9.

Published

2025-01-14